Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhodes  i understand, of course you want to big up the release but i also think in this day and age honesty is the best policy, no-one likes to feel hoodwinked. it's like saying: special features - fully restored 4:3 cropped version with original print damage. doesn't make much sense does it?
i would simply suggest not listing it as a special feature, and maybe including a small disclaimer as shameless have done when the film is cut or features footage of varying quality, i think people will always react better to this kind of honesty, and are more likely to be understanding of the fact that this situation was imposed on arrow. |
I think 4:3 and damaged is a touch surely? I quite understand there are people who don't like what Storaro does but it is a restoration by him - it would be a little odd to single that out on packaging as a defect surely?