Quote:
Originally Posted by BAKA  Really? Who released those? Even the cut Vipco release had a solid AV quality, despite the alterations, and if there's a company out there putting out something of a quality even worse than Vipco, I'd love to know who they are! The R1 Shriek Show release in particular is very good, and upscales quite well. |
Look at the non-UK European releases - quite a few of them have poor quality. You asked for names - EC Entertainment, Laser Paradise, Mondo HE, XT Video. Most of them used the same low quality source. The Vipco releases may be better - however, they are cut, as you rightly say.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAKA What a silly thing to say. Given the option I can't possibly understand why anyone would consider something of a lower quality over something of a higher quality. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daemonia Most films have an audience, and members of those audiences who have Blu-ray would most certainly like the films they enjoy to be presented in HD. So, please, don't speak for all of us. I would love to own this on Blu-ray - and why shouldn't I?  |
I never did. Please spare me a debate on principles and read the sentence again. As usual, I used the smiley on purpose. Besides, the cinematography of this film works exactly the same way in SD as it would in a possible HD release - something I would not say about
The Fifth Element, a film that really benefits from HD. Of course - given a decent source, HD would improve the picture quality of
House on the Edge of the Park - as it would in a release of the original
Frankenstein (I am not sure about the master of this one, though) and as it will in the upcoming
"Blood Trilogy" Blu-ray release - however, those films will not benefit in the way some other flicks do (
A Bay of Blood, a stylish movie, really did!).
Here the whole sentence again - for all to make notes, if necessary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prince_Vajda This film needs no HD, if you ask me - it's horrifying enough in SD. |
Greetings!