View Single Post
  #12077  
Old 12th February 2012, 06:19 PM
keirarts's Avatar
keirarts keirarts is offline
Cult Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Barrow-in-furness
Blog Entries: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulD View Post
Finally got round to watching the remake of Nightmare on Elm Street last night. I went in with low expectations and a fairly open mind (honest!) but this was far worse than I ever could have expected. AWFUL cgi (especially the bit where Freddy comes through the wall), totally pointless bits from the original pasted in and the apparently ambiguous is ''he/isn't he a child molestor?'' bit came out of nowhere with people just assuming the parents were wrong, even though in a previous scene he'd told Nancy she was his 'favourite' as he licked her face! Dreadful.

I also hated how the parents only reacted the way they did to Freddy because they were personally affected by him. It was much better in the original when they acted out of a misguided sense of parental duty with no direct emotional link to Freddy's actions.

It looked as if it was shot with a view to post-convert it to 3D - a lot of the shots were done with things pointing towards the camera (the bit with Freddys garden tool in the soil and the shot of the mother getting killed through the mirror) which was also off-putting at times.

Overall: a colossal stinker.

i'm in 100% agreement with you, that film was S^&^. I went to see the movie genuinely interested in how the dream sequences would play out with current technology. As it turns out pretty bloody awful. The film felt like someone was approaching the film as a gun-for-hire director and turning out something they thought people might like without any regard for the genre. I rate the remake as possibly the ONLY nightmare movie worse than freddy's dead and thats pretty god-damnned awful indeed!
Just imagine if the producers had hired a 'visionary director' someone with a real visual flair and real excitment at turning in some impressive looking dream sequences, someone like tarsem singh (at least at a purely visual level) and we could have actually landed a pretty decent horror movie.

Tragically the end result breaks the cardinal no1 keir's rule of film-making...

its boring.

I can forgive a lot but not that!


Boring, tepid, lifeless, passionless by the numbers corporate greed in celluloid form.
Reply With Quote