Quote:
Originally Posted by vincenzo  At the end of the day the rape and butchery in the film is simply makeup and acting. The animal killings are real. |
But, they were still real (and really dead) in the 'animal cruelty free' version.
Someone just skipped over it for you.
So you surely don't care that the animals were really killed any way,
or else why have anything to do with the film that killed them!?
Which indeed only leaves the aesthetic aspect. So why is rape and butchery okay from an aesthetic point of view then?
Yes it's not real...but by watching (even buying) the film you don't really care that the animal stuff was real either. Or why buy it and support it?
Not wanting to have anything to do with the film, if the real animal death is a big moral problem for you,
I totally respect.
Simply skipping over the visual evidence though of what you have a moral problem over...is utter hypocrisy.
"This is the film where they really raped a child" "My God! I want nothing to do with such a film" "This is the film where they really raped a child...but those scenes have been removed for you" "Excellent! I'll buy it tomorrow" 