[Susan Foreman]

Originally Posted by gag

So she took her son who was 16 and because it was a late night showing they refused her entry with him, and said he wasn't getting in , I told her to make a complaint I think thats out of order , I get the late showing idea but still think that wrong ..

Originally Posted by Nosferatu@Cult Labs

The film is a 15, which is the only criteria for allowing/refusing permission. If he had ID showing he was 15 or older, and was not intoxicated or being abusive, then I don't believe the cinema management had any right to refuse entry

Originally Posted by gag

I told her that, she said that they said it was after 10:30 and late showing where for 18+ plus b@11ocks if you ask me , i told her to make a official complaint why should she lose around £20 because of some bell end

Originally Posted by bleakshaun

That's dumb, I mean do they expect 16 year olds on a Friday night to be sleeping at that time.

Sent from my MediaPad T1 8.0 Pro using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Nosferatu@Cult Labs

As far as I know, the time is irrelevant. They can only refuse entry based on age and behaviour, so a complaint should be upheld and money refunded.

It's not uncommon for cinemas to only allow customers that are aged 18+ for late showings of films, regardless of the certificate

Boy, 12, turned away from seeing 12a-rated Fast and the Furious on his birthday because it was 'too late' - Mirror Online