Quote:
Originally Posted by gag  Tbh updating , modernising, special effects , cgi, pointless humour and all that malarkey doesn't necessary mean better with anything, irrelevant if like or don't tennant, or Eccleston / or certain stories the nu who really doesn't have the same charm and appeal as the original, as the old saying goes if it isn't broke don't fix it, That's all I'm going to say on the matter. |
That's because New Who was never really intended to be a legitimate continuation of Who to begin with. It was always intended as a complete reboot/reimagining (including the central character). The only reason it was even given the name was to sucker the existing fanbase into supporting it while it found its feet, but the long-term goal was always to get rid of them once it had enough modern morons watching it. All that's happened in the last few years is that the pretense has finally been dropped altogether.