#141
| |||
| |||
When you remove the black lines at the top and bottom you get 2.35:1 (although removing the black line at the left of the frame gives you a 2.34:1 image)
|
#142
| |||
| |||
Quote:
Here is the enlarged capture: http://img847.imageshack.us/img847/6...with20the2.jpg |
#144
| |||
| |||
Quote:
Which would be approximately 2.9:1 btw Or am I misunderstanding you? |
#145
| ||||
| ||||
Oops! You're quite right. Need more coffee before posting. Ignore me.
|
#146
| |||
| |||
I was getting a little confused there.
|
#147
| |||
| |||
Yeah, they're shots from the Camera'persons' point of view at the beginning of the film. That shot probably shows how warped Storaro's modern thinking really is. |
#148
| |||
| |||
Maybe I was misunderstood. I was merely pointing out a shot that seemed to indicate that 2.35:1 is indeed the OAR. |
#149
| |||
| |||
hope this will be ok
__________________ http://c.mymovies.dk/dtollick |
#150
| |||
| |||
Quote:
Honestly, I'm curious what print was actually used to make the HD master. Blue Underground says it was a new scan of the negative, but it looks like the same exact HD master that we've seen on various DVD and Blu-ray releases since about 2007. (I'm not saying anything, I'm just... saying. ) To get back to Bird with the Compromised Aspect Ratio, I'll be very curious to see how it looks via screencaps, if nothing else. BU released it on DVD with a very similar looking transfer back in 2005, I think, so I imagine the HD master they used is anything but new. That doesn't mean it's bad, of course, but I'll be curious to see if the "Storaro-ized" transfer has notably different contrast, grain structure or anything along those lines. I'm not happy about the aspect ratio at all, but I am curious about the "look" of the new master, if that makes any sense. I'm pretty sure what Der Spiler was getting at was, if one were to crop this particular scene, the entire effect of being within a camera's viewfinder would be obscured - or maybe even lost completely. The moment I read about the 2.0:1 ratio, these scenes immediately sprang to mind as a perfect example of why matting a film in retrospect is a VERY bad idea. |
Like this? Share it using the links below! |
| |