Cult Labs

Go Back   Cult Labs > Film Discussions > VHS & Exploitation > Censorship
All AlbumsBlogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Like Tree81Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #211  
Old 5th June 2009, 11:12 PM
The Reaper Man@Cult Labs's Avatar
Cult Don
Cult Labs Radio Contributor
Good Trader
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark meakin View Post
I'd say the Zebra footage looked the most obviously staged as mentioned already.As Vin mentioned the spearings of Hippos & Elephants are very difficult to watch.
Not films I plan to revisit.You're right Mark,the hippos and elephant scenes are the worst I've seen.The only reason I've kept these pieces of trash are completion in my BU collection.
The perpetrators of the abovementioned scenes are the animals.
__________________

Teddy, I'm a Scotch drinker - you know that. I just have the occasional brandy when I'm not drinking.
Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 5th June 2009, 11:13 PM
Cult Addict
Senior Moderator Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gag View Post
IF im correct im Clockwork orange was nvr officaly banned stanley kubrick refused for yrs to give it general release because critics slagged it off at 1st and he wasnt amused so he refuse to release it
The BBFC have never cut or banned it. Kubrick withdrew the film from UK cinemas in 1973 after allegedly receiving death threats and, as he owned the UK rights to it, he refused to re-release it. It was only reissued after his death.

Ferman said he would have cut the film (the rape scenes) if it had been submitted to him during his time as censor.
Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 6th June 2009, 06:03 AM
Angel's Avatar
Cultist on the Rampage
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

Yes that was strange about Clockwork Orange, Kubrick never spoke publicly in interviews about his decision to withdraw the film. I wonder who these people were sending death threats? An unusual reason for a director to withdraw his film. Of course the tabloids insist the reason was because of copy cat behaviour, but of course they would say that wouldn't they.

The film only had a very limited release anyway at the time.
Reply With Quote
  #214  
Old 6th June 2009, 06:20 AM
Angel's Avatar
Cultist on the Rampage
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

The BBFC's decision to reject Deadbeat at Dawn was covered in SEE NO EVIL

By requesting the cutting of all shots glamourising the use of imitable weapons, we hoped to reduce the violence sufficiently to make the video acceptable as an 18, but this cutting merely revealed that the frequency and intensity of violent behaviour and incidents was an insuperable problem in itself. All the male gang members resort to violence at the least provocation, and the violence they inflict results in maiming, mutilation and death. Violent problems provoke violent solutions and the acting out of violent impulses provide the only pleasure on offer. Given the problem of violence by youth gangs in Britain, the Board is concerned that this video could attract viewing by young offenders whose own behavior might be validated and confirmed by the behaviour of the characters, resulting in harm to society and members of the public.
Reply With Quote
  #215  
Old 6th June 2009, 10:18 AM
Cult Addict
Senior Moderator Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

The BBFC didn't really cover themselves in glory with this one. Surely they should have rejected it first, rather than the cut version. They'd certainly have had an idea upon first viewing what a cut print would have looked like.
Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 6th June 2009, 11:08 AM
Pete's Avatar
Cult Veteran
Good Trader
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Liverpool
Blog Entries: 13
Default

I read in an interview with Carl Daft that the bbfc requested cuts and were going to allow a release when the head examiner entered the room, overuled them and rejected it.
__________________


Letterboxd | Youtube | Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #217  
Old 6th June 2009, 11:09 AM
Pete's Avatar
Cult Veteran
Good Trader
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Liverpool
Blog Entries: 13
Default

What are the chances of Bare Behind Bars getting an uncut release over here?
__________________


Letterboxd | Youtube | Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 6th June 2009, 11:23 AM
Cult Addict
Senior Moderator Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

It wouldn't be rejected again today though it would definitely be cut. The final house siege would be problematic. Especially the scenes with the boy.
Reply With Quote
  #219  
Old 8th June 2009, 12:45 PM
Pete's Avatar
Cult Veteran
Good Trader
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Liverpool
Blog Entries: 13
Default

Just been browsing the bbfc site and noticed almost all of John Waynes early short ( ish ) films have been cut.
__________________


Letterboxd | Youtube | Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #220  
Old 8th June 2009, 03:38 PM
Cult Addict
Senior Moderator Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

Nearly always for horsefalls. With the exception of The Comancheros all of Wayne's feature films are uncut today.

Quite a few of Wayne's films suffered cinema cuts on original release.
Reply With Quote
Reply  

Like this? Share it using the links below!


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Our goal is to keep Cult Labs friendly. If you feel discouraged from posting by certain members' behaviour then you can e-mail us in complete confidence.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
All forum posts are contributed by members of the site; Cult Labs cannot take responsibility for all content posted on the site. If you have an issue with content posted on the site please click the 'report post' button.
Copyright © 2014 Cult Laboratories Ltd. All rights reserved.