What Films Have You Seen Recently?

[Pete]

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!

[bizarre_eye@Cult Labs]

Wifey's watching X-Factor in the next room. The sound of the screaming idiotic drones of an 'audience' are annoying me so I've stuck iTunes on to block it out...

[Pete]

I think someone has just been singing the Ghostbuster's song.

[bizarre_eye@Cult Labs]

Originally Posted by loops

I think someone has just been singing the Ghostbuster's song.

It wasn't Cheryl and Danni in their little dresses was it loops?! Or were you dreaming!

[Pete]

If only! I think it was those two lads everyone hates.

[bizarre_eye@Cult Labs]

Brown and Darling?

[42ndStreetFreak]

"Rosemary's Baby"

Hack about 10 minutes out of this and things would improve in leaps 'n' bounds.

There are too many repetitive scenes and events and the whole Satanic plot (if it exists...but I think by the end we are meant to realise it is indeed real)seems rather flawed and long winded in execution.
The plan of the all powerful Lord of Hell has to rely on the complete consumption of a chocolate mousse?

And although I like John Cassavetes he is never, ever, anything other than rather unlikeable and suspicious. With his endless forced smirks and bursts of rage you never, not once, feel this is a trustworthy guy and innocent Husband. He seems to be on the wrong path (indeed the left hand path! LOL!) from the start.
It would indeed have been far more effective (and fascinating) if the clean cut, likable, Robert Redford (who was originally up for the Husband role) had taken the part.
As quite frankly to have had a "Barefoot in the Park" style Redford be exposed as pimping out his young wife to Satan would have been a real shocker...and completely unexpected to a virginal 60's audience.
With Cassavetes though, you think he's up to something as soon as he appears!

This aside though, Polanski has delivered a surprisingly engaging Satanic slow burner that has some engaging characters and a nice air of sinister mystery and dark conspiracy.
Mia Farrow is just the right side of twee and does a great job later on as her character's natural shrewishness valiantly tries to fight back against the all powerful witches plotting against her.

I have to wonder why this still rates an '18' in the UK though. A nicely bloody body aside (and I'm still not sure why and how this character died either...her existence in the plot seems rather strange and unexplained) we have nothing else at all except some mild nudity, Halloween costume Devil claws and the most sedate rape ever filmed.
This is '15' material.

I still refuse to see this as a real classic in 2009 and I put it far behind "The Omen", but it does hold the attention for the most part, is well made and directed and delivers a stonking finale.

[bizarre_eye@Cult Labs]

I love Rosemary's Baby and actually prefer it to The Omen. Nice review though 42nd.

[Gojirosan]

Gosh! I wouldn't have imagined anyone could consider The Omen in the same league as Rosemary's Baby, never mind better than it!

As Bizarre Eye said though, great review! Thanks for posting. I love reading the reviews on here. They're always interesting - even if I disagree!

[42ndStreetFreak]

Cheers.

OOOOH yes! I most certainly put "The Omen" far above "Rosemary".
Pensioners with chocolate mousse and the world's most suspicious husband do not a great Satanic plot make.

I still like it and fully understand and appreciate its historical placing. But this does not move me in any of the ways "The Omen" does.
And yeah...I prefer "The Omen" to "The Exorcist" too!