| ||||
I don't think any of these are good. The only one that was moderately entertaining was the first.
__________________ My articles @ Dread Central and Diabolique Magazine In-depth analysis on horror, exploitation, and other shocking cinema @ Cinematic Shocks |
| ||||
I actually thought 2 was the worst of the lot, but it's been a long time since I've seen it.
__________________ My articles @ Dread Central and Diabolique Magazine In-depth analysis on horror, exploitation, and other shocking cinema @ Cinematic Shocks |
| ||||
Wolves at the door Bland. That's my one word review for this inconsequential home invasion film that claims to be 'based' on the real life manson killings, then wants to have its cake and eat it by directly referencing the actual killings. This extremely bad taste moment it about the only 'interesting' thing in a film that otherwise feels very much like a seen it all before piece of cinematic fluff. I saw Mark Kermode say he hated it, honestly it didn't inspire that level of emotion in me. I just thought it was very flat, uninspired and by the numbers. Wait for this in poundland. Drifter Second of yesterday evening. Imperfect perhaps but its a much more interesting film than Wolves at the door. Two brothers make their way through a desolate desert wasteland in their car. It seems to be some point in the near future and as the film progresses we get the impression that society has collapsed and its a case of survival of the fittest. The older brother is an armed badass and has no compunction in killing when necessary, we see this in a scene where his younger, weaker brother is captured and beaten. Eventually the brothers end up in a backwater town populated by cannibals and things go badly wrong. when he realises he can no longer depend on his older brother the younger brother realises he must either learn to be strong or die. The film has an overly saturated, almost surreal colour pallette in places. It has an overly styalised sound design and an electronic sound design. Its influences seem to be mixed between Texas chainsaw massacre and Gregg Araki's doom generation and nowhere. Its a film that is not without its flaws. The cannibal family feel somewhat generic and the bizarre, almost cartoonish tone, mixed in with some nasty violence might grate with some. However after the previous turkey it at least felt a little fresh and interesting and is well paced enough at under the 90 minute mark. |
| ||||
I remembered Nemesis being badly executed in it.
__________________ My articles @ Dread Central and Diabolique Magazine In-depth analysis on horror, exploitation, and other shocking cinema @ Cinematic Shocks |
Like this? Share it using the links below! |
| |