Upcoming Non-UK Blu-ray Releases - Page 347

Criterion7 · #**3461** 12th January 2013, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nosferatu@Cult Labs

Could we try and be civil towards one another please?

His response was rude and I tried not to stoop to his level. But that post he did should have been removed already. It was baiting and wrong.

Nosferatu@Cult Labs · #**3462** 12th January 2013, 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Criterion7

His response was rude and I tried not to stoop to his level. But that post he did should have been removed already. It was baiting and wrong.

As others, including me, expressed similar sentiments about those releases, I imagine (and hope) it was posted in a joking fashion without any sinister or antagonistic motives.

fuzzymctiger · #**3463** 12th January 2013, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nosferatu@Cult Labs

As others, including me, expressed similar sentiments about those releases, I imagine (and hope) it was posted in a joking fashion without any sinister or antagonistic motives.

I have to say, Ive noticed on here that whenever someone responds with a image, or a video, it's most of the time a joke.

Criterion7 · #**3464** 12th January 2013, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nosferatu@Cult Labs

As others, including me, expressed similar sentiments about those releases, I imagine (and hope) it was posted in a joking fashion without any sinister or antagonistic motives.

It was still childish and wasnt in the best of taste whether you agree with him or not about the art.It would be nice to see it done fairly. If you are going to comment about my response to him, maybe it would be good to address the "baiting" response in the first place.

Nosferatu@Cult Labs · #**3465** 12th January 2013, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Criterion7

It was still childish and wasnt in the best of taste whether you agree with him or not about the art.It would be nice to see it done fairly. If you are going to comment about my response to him, maybe it would be good to address the "baiting" response in the first place.

If I thought his initial post was baiting you or was inappropriate in any other way, I would have responded. As I thought it was humorous and not malicious, I saw no reason to intervene.

bizarre_eye@Cult Labs · #**3466** 12th January 2013, 09:11 AM

From my perspective it was clearly posted in jest (no one I've come across on here is intentionally antagonistic and a 'baiter' of others - if they are, then their time here is very short-lived

), but understandably interpretations do and will differ, especially on the internet.

ReturnToZero · #**3467** 12th January 2013, 09:19 AM

I didn't see that coming

Nosferatu@Cult Labs · #**3468** 12th January 2013, 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bizarre_eye@Cult Labs

From my perspective it was clearly posted in jest (no one I've come across on here is intentionally antagonistic and a 'baiter' of others - if they are, then their time here is very short-lived

), but understandably interpretations do and will differ, especially on the internet.

Completely agree. I imagine it's down to interpretation and I'm sorry if Criterion7 took offence to the picture which others must have seen as a humorous post (it wasn't reported), but it's probably best left alone so as not to dominate this thread and lead to someone saying something they later regret.