#71
| ||||
| ||||
__________________ People try to put us down Just because we get around Golly, Gee! it's wrong to be so guilty |
#72
| ||||
| ||||
|
#73
| ||||
| ||||
George Takei: Gay Sulu 'really unfortunate' - BBC News I have a lot of time for George Takei, but I can't help thinking he is being narrow-minded in his thoughts over this
__________________ People try to put us down Just because we get around Golly, Gee! it's wrong to be so guilty |
#74
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
I honesly don't see the point of making Sulu gay.
__________________ "Give me grain or give me death!" |
#75
| ||||
| ||||
It's supposed to be a tribute to George Takei, who is gay himself
__________________ People try to put us down Just because we get around Golly, Gee! it's wrong to be so guilty |
#76
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
Yes, I read that. And sorry, I still don't see the point of it. Perhaps we can also have Pine war a wig, in homage to Shatner. Both ideas serve no purpose.
__________________ "Give me grain or give me death!" |
#77
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
|
#78
| ||||
| ||||
I don't feel there is a need to go back to a character which is already rooted in the canon of the series and say, "oh he's this now". No matter how much the producers thought it was a nice nod to George it was unnecessary.
__________________ Triumphant sight on a northern sky |
#79
| ||||
| ||||
But wasn't 'Star Trek' given a reboot by the 2009 film, and as such, it's not a continuation of the original series anymore
__________________ People try to put us down Just because we get around Golly, Gee! it's wrong to be so guilty |
#80
| ||||
| ||||
Yes, and no, Sulu is still a canonical character in the series so it should stick to the rules.
__________________ Triumphant sight on a northern sky |
Like this? Share it using the links below! |
| |